ABSTRACT
This study describes the case of a health professional infected first by influenza virus A(H3N2) and then by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) 11 days later. Respiratory samples and clinical data were collected from the patient and from close contacts. RNA was extracted from samples and reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) was used to investigate the viruses. The patient presented with two different illness events: the first was characterized by fever, chest and body pain, prostration and tiredness, which ceased on the ninth day; RT-qPCR was positive only for influenza virus A(H3N2). Eleven days after onset of the first symptoms, the patient presented with sore throat, nasal congestion, coryza, nasal itching, sneezing and coughing, and a second RT-qPCR test was positive only for SARS-CoV-2; in the second event, symptoms lasted for 11 days. SARS-CoV-2 sequencing identified the Omicron BA.1 lineage. Of the patient's contacts, one was coinfected with influenza A(H3N2) and SARS-CoV-2 lineage BA.1.15 and the other two were infected only with SARS-CoV-2, one also with Omicron BA.1.15 and the other with BA.1.1. Our findings reinforce the importance of testing for different viruses in cases of suspected respiratory viral infection during routine epidemiological surveillance because common clinical manifestations of COVID-19 mimic those of other viruses, such as influenza.
Este estudio describe el caso de un profesional de la salud que contrajo la infección primero por el virus de la gripe A (H3N2) y a continuación por el coronavirus 2 del síndrome respiratorio agudo grave (SARS-CoV-2) 11 días después. Se recogieron muestras respiratorias y datos clínicos del paciente y sus contactos cercanos. Se extrajo ARN de muestras y se utilizó la reacción en cadena de la polimerasa cuantitativa con transcripción inversa (RT-qPCR, por su sigla en inglés) para investigar los virus. El paciente presentó dos procesos infecciosos distintos: el primero se caracterizó por fiebre, dolor corporal y torácico, postración y cansancio, que cesó en el noveno día. La prueba mediante RT-qPCR solo fue positiva en el virus de la gripe A (H3N2). Once días después del inicio de los primeros síntomas, el paciente manifestó dolor de garganta, congestión nasal, catarro, picazón nasal, estornudos y tos. Una segunda prueba mediante RT-qPCR solo fue positiva para el SARS-CoV-2 y durante este segundo proceso los síntomas duraron 11 días. La secuenciación del SARS-CoV-2 identificó el linaje ómicron BA.1. De los contactos del paciente, uno presentaba una coinfección por el virus de la gripe A (H3N2) y el linaje BA.1.15 del SARS-COV-2, y los otros dos presentaban infecciones únicamente por SARS-CoV-2, uno también del linaje ómicron BA.1.15 y el otro de BA.1.1. Estos hallazgos refuerzan la importancia de realizar pruebas para detectar diferentes virus en casos de sospecha de infección viral respiratoria durante la vigilancia epidemiológica de rutina porque las manifestaciones clínicas comunes de COVID-19 son similares a las de otros virus, como en el caso de la gripe.
Este estudo descreve o caso de uma profissional de saúde infectada primeiro pelo vírus influenza A (H3N2) e, 11 dias depois, pelo coronavírus da síndrome respiratória aguda grave 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Amostras respiratórias e dados clínicos foram coletados da paciente e de contatos próximos. RNA foi extraído das amostras, e o método de reação em cadeia da polimerase via transcriptase reversa quantitativa (RT-qPCR) foi utilizado para investigar os vírus. A paciente apresentou dois quadros clínicos distintos. O primeiro foi caracterizado por febre, dor no peito e no corpo, prostração e fadiga, que cessou no nono dia. A RT-qPCR foi positiva apenas para o vírus da influenza A (H3N2). Onze dias após o início dos primeiros sintomas, a paciente apresentou dor de garganta, congestão nasal, coriza, prurido nasal, espirros e tosse. Um segundo teste de RT-qPCR foi positivo apenas para SARS-CoV-2. No segundo evento, os sintomas duraram 11 dias. O sequenciamento do SARS-CoV-2 identificou a cepa Ômicron BA.1. Dentre os contatos da paciente, um teve coinfeção por influenza A (H3N2) e SARS-COV-2 (cepa BA.1.15), e os outros dois foram infectados apenas por SARS-CoV-2 (um também pela cepa Ômicron BA.1.15 e o outro pela BA.1.1). Nossos achados reforçam a importância de testes para a detecção de diferentes vírus em casos de suspeita de infecção viral respiratória durante a vigilância epidemiológica de rotina, visto que as manifestações clínicas comuns da COVID-19 imitam as de outros vírus, como o vírus influenza.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Brazil has one of the highest numbers of COVID-19 cases and deaths. Rio Grande do Sul (RS) in southern Brazil is one of the leading states in terms of case numbers. As part of the national public health network, the State Central Laboratory (LACEN-RS) changed its routine in 2020 to focus on the diagnosis of COVID-19. This study evaluated the laboratory surveillance of COVID-19 suspected cases analyzed at the LACEN-RS in 2020. METHODS: Viral detection was performed using RT-qPCR in samples from patients with respiratory infection who met the study criteria. Viral RNA was isolated using commercial manual kits or automated extractors, and SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR was performed using the Bio-Manguinhos/Rio de Janeiro, IBMP/Paraná, or Allplex 2019-nCoV assay. In total, 360 representative SARS-CoV-2 samples were sequenced using the Illumina platform. RESULTS: In total, 31,197 of 107,578 (positivity rate = 29%) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. The number of RT-qPCR tests performed per month followed the COVID-19 epidemic curve observed for the state, with peaks in July-August and December. Females accounted for 63% of the samples, whereas the positivity rate was higher among males (33.1% males vs. 26.5% females). The positivity rate was higher in adults aged 50-79 years compared to the overall positivity rate. The majority of cases were observed in the capital, Porto Alegre, and the metropolitan region. Ten distinct lineages were identified, with B.1.1.28, B.1.1.33, and P.2 being the most frequent. CONCLUSIONS: Here, we describe laboratory surveillance of COVID-19 to identify priorities for epidemiological surveillance actions in RS.